- Posts: 144
- Thank you received: 89
ion polarity question - something doesn't make sense
- larrymagee
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
02 Jul 2013 22:44 #34297
by larrymagee
ion polarity question - something doesn't make sense was created by larrymagee
I'm reading Jim's MMS of the 3rd Millennium. p 181 says that the poisons released by disease causing pathogens is negatively charged. Also that the negative charge of the poisons is attracted to the positive charge of chlorine dioxide which destroys it. He says all good bacteria makes no poisons and have no negative charge.
I've seen some discussion of zappers with activated MMS here. It seems the theory of the zappers is the exact opposite -
Info about Don Croft's zapper on his website says "All parasites and diseased tissues are positively charged. The zapper introduces negative ions through the skin and into the body's living tissue, killing the parasites by reversing their polarity and also helping to heal the diseased tissue. Healthy tissue is negatively charged."
Either I don't understand this or somebody's science is way off.
I've been using a zapper for about a year and just started activated MMS maintenace doses a couple of weeks ago. Is there any reason I would want to use both positive ions (MMS) and negative ions (zapper) to keep myself healthy? I'd really appreciate if anyone who really knows this science could help with an answer. I decided not to use the zapper within 2 hours of my maintenance dose.
I've seen some discussion of zappers with activated MMS here. It seems the theory of the zappers is the exact opposite -
Info about Don Croft's zapper on his website says "All parasites and diseased tissues are positively charged. The zapper introduces negative ions through the skin and into the body's living tissue, killing the parasites by reversing their polarity and also helping to heal the diseased tissue. Healthy tissue is negatively charged."
Either I don't understand this or somebody's science is way off.
I've been using a zapper for about a year and just started activated MMS maintenace doses a couple of weeks ago. Is there any reason I would want to use both positive ions (MMS) and negative ions (zapper) to keep myself healthy? I'd really appreciate if anyone who really knows this science could help with an answer. I decided not to use the zapper within 2 hours of my maintenance dose.
The following user(s) said Thank You: bru79
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dreadwork
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 73
- Thank you received: 32
02 Jul 2013 23:10 #34298
by dreadwork
Replied by dreadwork on topic ion polarity question - something doesn't make sense
i do not get your logic man ... the clo2 is also negative ( - ) as stated in the book,
And i was wondering myself when i read about colloidal silver because they say that colloidal silver is positive charge and that the bad patogens are negative so this looks like the antithesis and i do not get it. So all that i read about colloidal silver is bullshit or i am just stupid ;d I rather believe in mms than silver but this got my brain a little distracted O_o
And i was wondering myself when i read about colloidal silver because they say that colloidal silver is positive charge and that the bad patogens are negative so this looks like the antithesis and i do not get it. So all that i read about colloidal silver is bullshit or i am just stupid ;d I rather believe in mms than silver but this got my brain a little distracted O_o
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- larrymagee
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 144
- Thank you received: 89
03 Jul 2013 00:27 #34299
by larrymagee
Replied by larrymagee on topic ion polarity question - something doesn't make sense
Thanks, Deadwork. I hope you're right. The way p 181 is written in Jim's book makes it sound like clo2 is positively charged, as does this sentence from
www.factsheetproject.org/mmsfactssheet.pdf
"MMS and healthy human tissue both have a positive electrical charge and therefore repel each other. On the other hand, the surface of pathogens carry a negative electrical charge which attracts them to MMS where they can be oxidized. "
Do you happen to know where in the book it says that chlorine dioxide is negative?
Or maybe I'm mixing up negative/positive ORP with -/+ electrical charge ????
Do you happen to know where in the book it says that chlorine dioxide is negative?
Or maybe I'm mixing up negative/positive ORP with -/+ electrical charge ????
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dreadwork
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 73
- Thank you received: 32
03 Jul 2013 10:37 #34311
by dreadwork
Replied by dreadwork on topic ion polarity question - something doesn't make sense
As i remember from the book , the patogens are + and the ion of mms and healthy cells are - thats why the mms does not kill gut flora etc... i might dare to say that this fact sheet is incorrect about this. i would check it in jim's book but i lend it to my friend so ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- larrymagee
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 144
- Thank you received: 89
03 Jul 2013 19:05 #34323
by larrymagee
Replied by larrymagee on topic ion polarity question - something doesn't make sense
Thanks so much, Steve. that really helped. I guess my zapper isn't working against the clo2 after all.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.301 seconds